I was told at my 36 week ultrasound that the baby wasn’t quite as big as she “should be”.

So, who came up with this term: AGA – Appropriate for Gestational Age? And WHO decides what that should be? I am a small, petite woman – About 5 feet and not pregnant I weigh around 115. Why should my babies be 8 or 9 pounds?

 In my research, I’ve read that a normal, full-term baby is about 7 1/2 pounds, that is what is considered AGA for a newborn. A premature baby is naturally smaller, but still considered AGA because the size is appropriate for the length of time in the womb.

SGA means small for gestational age. This is an infant below the 10th percentile on a standard growth chart.

IUGR means intra-uterine growth retardation and is often used instead of SGA. People may think it’s the same thing, but it’s not. An IUGR baby is less than the 3rd percentile and there is often abnormal genetic or environmental influences affecting the baby’s growth.

This make all IUGR babies SGA, but NOT all SGA babies are IUGR.

In my case, two of my babies were SGA, NOT IUGR. However, nobody was able to determine this in time. In this last pregnancy, I was told at 36 weeks the baby measured 34 weeks. She was in the 15th percentile. 2 weeks later, I went back for another ultrasound. I was 38 weeks and she measured 35 weeks, so she was now in the 10th percentile.

It wasn’t so much that she was on the small side, but it was that she was “falling”. And for this reason, I was advised to be induced. And because everyone was nervous, I went ahead with the inductions.

With my fourth child, she weighed only 5lbs 1oz. The placenta was calcified and my doula told me it was the thinnest cord she had ever seen. I do believe inducing was the right thing to do with her. She was small and something was up with that placenta and cord.

However, with my fifth child, she weighed 6lbs 3oz, the placenta was fine, and I heard that the cord was a little thin, but not bad. One of the nurses said that she showed signs of being an IUGR baby, that her proportions were “off”. I didn’t see it. Was it “new baby syndrome”? Maybe. Still when I look back at pictures, nothing seems wrong. Maybe I should have gotten another opinion? Maybe I should have waited a few more days? Maybe I should have tried the castor oil?

*SIGH* I can’t keep harping on what I should have done or could have done though. I must move on. If we had another child and the same thing came up, I would definitely look into it more. That’s all I want anyone to do, research it.


1 Comment »

  1. Kristin Said:

    (((hugs))) Don’t beat yourself up over not taking more time to research. If memory serves, they were telling you NOT to take too much time to research, and that’s enough to stress out any mommy-to-be. I do wish you had gotten your home birth, is all. Maybe with #6. 😉

{ RSS feed for comments on this post} · { TrackBack URI }

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: